Newsletter 22 November 2021


This week, there’s been a certain degree of Remainer kite-flying and speculation that the government is now unwilling to actually push negotiations any further.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Dear Subscribers,

This week, there’s been a certain degree of Remainer kite-flying and speculation that the government is now unwilling to actually push negotiations any further.  To judge from David Frost’s public communications, however, there remains little movement.  Indeed, he offered a rejoinder to those who viewed his softening of tone as a softening of his position.  The EU, meanwhile, has retreated from its more bellicose language of trade war and the threats it was brandishing until relatively recently.

1 2
Giving EU easements a Frosty reception

Various sources have also reiterated the difficulties being faced by traders from the rest of the UK to northern Ireland, in a sign of the Protocol’s continuing negative effects.  Importantly, they confirm the view that the EU’s recent proposals will (in many ways) merely make things worse – as Harry Western and Caroline Bell pointed out for Briefings a few weeks ago.

In other Brexit news, a campaign group called ‘European Movement UK’ is funding challengers to a number of Eurosceptic Conservative MPs.  The group’s foremost patrons comprise aging former Tory grandees and has-beens such as Michael Heseltine and Kenneth Clarke, and their loyalty to Europe over affection for their former party is revealing of the depths to which their careers have sunk.  One hopes the Electoral Commission will prosecute any irregularities on their behalf as fervently it did the indiscretions of Brexit campaigners.

Brexit-watchers ought not to have missed the announcement of Royal Dutch Shell of its intention to definitively shift its headquarters to London.  The company was recently ordered by the Netherlands’ highest court to cut its carbon emissions by 45% and is locked in tax disputes with the Dutch government.  The decision is a blow to those who predicted Brexit would lead to Britain’s financial ruin, and offers a hint of things to come as Britain sloughs off the burden of excessive EU regulation.

Finally, on the issue of shortages, a Daily Mail article has recently confirmed our view that September’s petrol shortages were largely the result of media scare stories rather than genuine shortages.  Likewise, the BBC has carried sheepish acknowledgements by industry heads that there’s unlikely to be a turkey shortage either this Christmas.

2 2
Hardcore Remainers aren’t the only ones hoping for supply chain disruption this Christmas…

That’s not to say that there won’t be inflationary pressures, as global supply chains struggle to accommodate post-pandemic hikes in demand and energy bills run high as a result of the UK’s rapid de-carbonisation and China’s demand for LNG.  Readers should be fortified against the idea that Brexit is a significant factor, however.


Graham Gudgin has published a piece on the Northern Ireland naysing of Financial Times’ economics editor Martin Woolf in our Blogs section – see our summary and link below.


Who is still afraid of Martin Wolf?, by Graham Gudgin

Graham Gudgin takes up cudgels again with the chief economics commentator of the Financial Times, Martin Wolf, who recently denounced the intention of the UK Government to fundamentally reform the Northern Ireland Protocol.

‘Too bad if you agree a bad deal under any circumstances implies Wolf. In [Wolf’s] view the UK should just suck it up. There is no need in his view to restore UK sovereignty by writing the ECJ out of the deal. As always there is no criticism of the EU, instead focussing on belittling his own country.’

Is Article 16 Illegal?, by a Cambridge PhD Student

Rejoiner and EU efforts to frustrate the use of Article 16 to solve problems with the Northern Ireland Protocol are legally and politically unsound

‘If the court ruled that invoking Article 16 was illegal, it would be clearly trespassing on the territory of the executive by substituting its own judgement on what steps were reasonable under Article 16 for the informed view of ministers.’

Key Points this Week

For ‘A Cambridge PhD Student’s’ offering this week, see Is Article 16 Illegal? in our Blogs section



We are also on Twitter, posting articles and retweeting the daily events that bring Brexit to the fore in the national news.


Discussion also continues over on Facebook.

How you can help

There is much about Brexit still to be decided. Our MPs listen to their constituents. Do continue to send them links to our articles, especially on matters relevant to your constituency – for example, in rural areas, articles on the threat to British agriculture. Alternatively, make an appointment to speak to them at their next surgery. Let them know what you want post-Brexit Britain to look like.

As Boris Johnson said in in his post-election address, it is also time for unity and reconciliation. Keep reading our posts and share links to our quality content to help others understand how leaving the EU will be good for the UK economy and for our own democratic governance. We aim to educate our critics to think differently and more positively about the long-term impact of Brexit.

You can follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Yours Sincerely,

Newsletter Editor

A Cambridge PhD Student

Dr Graham Gudgin

Economist, Centre for Business Research, Judge Business School University of Cambridge

Professor Robert Tombs

Emeritus Professor of French History, University of Cambridge

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About the author

Briefings For Britain