Featured Security & defence Blog

Protecting UK National Security from PESCO: the EU’s Most Daring Hostile Post-Brexit Ploy

Written by Gwythian Prins

Gwythian Prins views PESCO as the EU’s Most Daring Hostile Post-Brexit Ploy. It looks like a military alliance. It sounds like a military alliance. It is a military alliance. And as such it is a threat to NATO… PESCO/EUDU’s formal goal is swiftly to acquire equal legal purchase over members and collaborating ‘Third Countries’, to acquire equal scale and status with NATO and then …to effect a reverse takeover of NATO by the EU: all this in time of war.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Read the full article here

PESCO (Permanent Structured Cooperation) with an emphasis on the P, is evolving into a EU Defence Union that is now positioning for a reverse take-over of NATO. Nothing could be more dangerous to UK national security, to continental European security and to the global Free World, in time of grey and hot war.

British Ministers are incorrectly briefed.  They are stating that it is possible and safe for the UK to dine à la carte in PESCO. This is not so. Like the devil, EU initiatives always dance through the details. The sotto voce battle cry of Brussels is: il n’y a que texte: he who controls the details, wins.

A detailed evidence-based report being published simultaneously on Briefings for Britain, which builds upon oral evidence before the European Scrutiny Select Committee on 17th May 2023, documents the history and the mechanics of PESCO. It also shows on the facts how enticement of the UK into subordination via the Military Mobility project involves binding commitments which would keep the UK in “high dynamic alignment” with EU rules.

The EU tactic revealed is one of ‘bait and hook’. In this, it resembles other arms of this interconnected strategy, for preeminent example the Northern Ireland Protocol/’Windsor Agreement’ and the HORIZON science funding programme.

The context for this is a geopolitical turning-point of immense significance. The centre of power in the EU is shifting inexorably from Paris to Warsaw, by-passing Berlin.  Its momentum is accelerated by the return of large-scale war to Europe for the first time since 1945 and by the implosion of social control during the worst civil violence since 1967-68 in France.  For the first time in a lifetime, this dynamic is not under US control;  and current trends are actively contrary to the wishes of President Biden. His recent actions over NATO leadership, confirm this.

Because it retains abundant ‘firm’ power, eschewing the snares of ‘greenery’ and relying on fossil fuels while preparing for nuclear energy, Poland is rapidly emerging as the Continent’s most economically prosperous and secure state. This underpins its emerging status as the Continent’s  leading military land power, along with battle-hardened Ukraine: the two major armies between the UK and Putin’s Russia.

The Baltic states naturally gravitate towards this new Continental centre and so does Scandinavia, whose newly active alignment in NATO is the other major geopolitical fact of recent times in Europe, making the Baltic a NATO sea. Putin has achieved this, which nothing and no-one else could previously do.

For cultural and military reasons this new alignment looks to the UK for support and direction, not least because of our leading role in Five Eyes. Thus, the UK must nerve itself. Monumental active choices beckon in a whole-hearted exercise of independent sovereign power. Brexit opened the door to this, as witnessed by the UK lead in supporting Ukraine with three key interventions since early 2022.

But forty years of living as a member state within Mr Barroso’s European Union ’empire’ (soi disant) have so atrophied the mental sinews of the British administrative and political classes that, now that the door to the cage has been opened, the canary dares not fly out to greet the sun of restored national sovereignty, but is dazzled and, blinking fearfully, prefers the familiarity of life as a willing captive, merely embellishing Brussels legislation. This is a real and present threat to UK security.  Why?

Because, since 2016 and aware of their fading influence, Paris and Brussels have been aggressively seeking to revalidate the legitimacy of the French vision of federal union on firmer ground. That chosen ground is the most fundamental: defence and security. The instrument is PESCO.

It is imperative that UK Ministers understand the dynamics documented in the long report and avoid the hooks built into PESCO; that they raise their eyes and ambitions eastwards in order to preserve NATO correctly, to engage pro-actively with the emerging Poland-centred alliance, and that they cease to believe that they can safely dine à la carte in Hôtel PESCO, when re-subordination of our newly restored sovereignty is the obligatory plat du jour, and where, like at Hotel California (which I have previously visited for BfB), the Night Manager says that you can check out any time you like but you can never leave.  This is not a drill.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About the author

Gwythian Prins